<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Attorney Market Power &#187; Trends</title>
	<atom:link href="https://attorneymarketpower.com/category/trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://attorneymarketpower.com</link>
	<description>Convert . Grow . Dominate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 03:46:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>When Cash Flow is King, Payment Options should be Prescribed</title>
		<link>https://attorneymarketpower.com/when-cash-flow-is-king-payment-options-should-be-prescribed/</link>
		<comments>https://attorneymarketpower.com/when-cash-flow-is-king-payment-options-should-be-prescribed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 02:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attorneymarketpower.com/?p=535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This question came from a client who wanted help positioning different payment options in hopes of increasing payments and &#8230; <a href="https://attorneymarketpower.com/when-cash-flow-is-king-payment-options-should-be-prescribed/"></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This question came from a client who wanted help positioning different payment options in hopes of increasing payments and getting clients to pay sooner and more predictably. They were presenting 3 payment options  in the following order and asked if I agreed with their logic: </p>
<ol>
<li>Extra Payment, which would allow them to pay in smaller monthly payments, by adding one additional payment.  It would work for clients who are more budget sensitive than time sensitive.</li>
<li>Increase of Plan, which would allow those with more urgency to file sooner as their account would be paid in full sooner.</li>
<li>Pay off Balance with Discount, which would allow clients to pay in &#8220;full&#8221; but with a 20% PIF incentive.</li>
</ol>
<p>Here was my response:<br />
Actually, I would reverse this order.  If they can&#8217;t pay in full, we&#8217;d say, &#8220;No worries.  Let&#8217;s increase your payment each month.&#8221; If they can&#8217;t do that, then we&#8217;d offer to do a one time extra payment. </p>
<p>Note: But this also changes depending on the client.  If they are planning to pay off anyway then do it faster w no discount driving home the benefit of filing sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://attorneymarketpower.com/when-cash-flow-is-king-payment-options-should-be-prescribed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to do when they want you to STOP calling …</title>
		<link>https://attorneymarketpower.com/what-to-do-when-they-want-you-to-stop-calling-2/</link>
		<comments>https://attorneymarketpower.com/what-to-do-when-they-want-you-to-stop-calling-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attorneymarketpower.com/?p=528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMP Client Q: Just FYI I have found that our no show rate goes thru the roof on rainy &#8230; <a href="https://attorneymarketpower.com/what-to-do-when-they-want-you-to-stop-calling-2/"></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AMP Client Q:</strong><br />
Just FYI I have found that our no show rate goes thru the roof on rainy days.  In other parts of the country they are used to rain and snow and weather.  We are not, if it rains or gets really cold clients do not show.</p>
<p>Additionally if it is gorgeous Saturday they go to the beach and do not show.</p>
<p>So I always pray for mild overcast days.  Any ideas on how we can avoid the bad show rate on bad weather days?</p>
<p><strong>A:</strong><br />
The best way to handle things like this is with a preemptive strike!</p>
<p>It’s your job to know ahead of time what the forecast is for the appointment day.  Since you should only be booking 48 hours out that information should be easy to find.</p>
<p>When you know the forecast calls for rain (or a perfectly sunny day) mention this in the appointment confirmation conversation, like this …</p>
<p>“I know we are expected to get rain that day.  Don&#8217;t let it prevent you from walking through the door and making a change.  Nothing changes in your life until you walk through our doors so you need to make that happen even if there’s a monsoon!”</p>
<p>If the weather is expected to be beautiful …</p>
<p>“I know the forecast calls for a beautiful beach day on Tuesday.  Don&#8217;t let it prevent you from walking through the door and making a change.  Just imagine how much more enjoyable a beach day will be without this debt hanging over your head.  Nothing changes in your life until you walk through our doors so you need to make that happen no matter what!”</p>
<p>Just preemptively mentioning this to your prospects can go a long way toward warding off no shows.  They’ll know that weather isn’t an acceptable excuse for not showing up for their appointment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://attorneymarketpower.com/what-to-do-when-they-want-you-to-stop-calling-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Not Filter Leads At the Appointment Setting Stage</title>
		<link>https://attorneymarketpower.com/why-not-filter-leads-at-the-appointment-setting-stage-3/</link>
		<comments>https://attorneymarketpower.com/why-not-filter-leads-at-the-appointment-setting-stage-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 03:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtechdesigns.net/amp/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the exact email I received from a private client inquiring about why his team shouldn&#8217;t filter leads &#8230; <a href="https://attorneymarketpower.com/why-not-filter-leads-at-the-appointment-setting-stage-3/"></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the exact email I received from a private client inquiring about why his team shouldn&#8217;t filter leads before the lead came in for an appointment &#8212; and my exact, unedited response &#8212; originally sent from my iPhone.</p>
<p><strong>From Client:</strong><br />
Not complaining just asking.</p>
<p><em>Just saw person where the only debt is 230,000 in back child support.  He is 61 and living on SS Disability.  Nothing I can do.  He says he told Robert what the issue was and was told to come in anyway.</p>
<p>I have seen some notes where my assistant will indicate he took 15 minutes to talk IC in the door but they have 1,500 in total debt.  I have seen people who flat out tell me they told him their issue and it was not anything we could deal with and he got them to come in anyway.</p>
<p>So I am paying for him to waste his time and paying him bonus on the appt that shows that I cannot help and filling the attorney calendars with useless IC appointments.</p>
<p>Is there no way for him to just ask about if they have any debt or what kind of debt and say weed out the really easy ones.</p>
<p>With that said I have complete faith in you and if you tell me this is the way to do it and just deal with then I will.</em></p>
<p><strong>My candid response: </strong><br />
<em>Let me say this is a day ole dilemma or whatever that saying is! </p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve found is that yes, annoyance factor is there when your calendar and time is spent with an IC you can not help. And then to pay out a bonus on it and have RDE time spent on it.</p>
<p>BUT&#8230;.</p>
<p>More money is lost when we have an RDE level employee (no personal hit on RDE I&#8217;m speaking of the position in general)  filtering in anyway.  Quickly they start filtering out what they should not for 2 reasons:</p>
<p>1 fear of back lash for setting something that was a &#8221; waste of your time&#8221;</p>
<p>2 it&#8217;s an easy excuse for poor lead conversion. &#8220;Why aren&#8217;t we converting leads to people waking through the door ( today, this week, etc)?&#8221; RDE. : &#8220;They are all DNQs, not enough debt, not the right debt, etc&#8221;</p>
<p>It IS important that when these ICs do come in we give them some (free) help or direction to better their situation so they feel like they got something and so they refer people we can help and so that when their low or wrong type of debt increases to something we can help they remember us.  This will help reduce their annoyance and help us make money down the road. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://attorneymarketpower.com/why-not-filter-leads-at-the-appointment-setting-stage-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Not Filter Leads At the Appointment Setting Stage</title>
		<link>https://attorneymarketpower.com/why-not-filter-leads-at-the-appointment-setting-stage/</link>
		<comments>https://attorneymarketpower.com/why-not-filter-leads-at-the-appointment-setting-stage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 03:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtechdesigns.net/amp/?p=440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the exact email I received from a private client inquiring about why his team shouldn&#8217;t filter leads &#8230; <a href="https://attorneymarketpower.com/why-not-filter-leads-at-the-appointment-setting-stage/"></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the exact email I received from a private client inquiring about why his team shouldn&#8217;t filter leads before the lead came in for an appointment &#8212; and my exact, unedited response &#8212; originally sent from my iPhone.</p>
<p><strong>From Client:</strong><br />
Not complaining just asking.</p>
<p><em>Just saw person where the only debt is 230,000 in back child support.  He is 61 and living on SS Disability.  Nothing I can do.  He says he told Robert what the issue was and was told to come in anyway.</p>
<p>I have seen some notes where my assistant will indicate he took 15 minutes to talk IC in the door but they have 1,500 in total debt.  I have seen people who flat out tell me they told him their issue and it was not anything we could deal with and he got them to come in anyway.</p>
<p>So I am paying for him to waste his time and paying him bonus on the appt that shows that I cannot help and filling the attorney calendars with useless IC appointments.</p>
<p>Is there no way for him to just ask about if they have any debt or what kind of debt and say weed out the really easy ones.</p>
<p>With that said I have complete faith in you and if you tell me this is the way to do it and just deal with then I will.</em></p>
<p><strong>My candid response: </strong><br />
<em>Let me say this is a day ole dilemma or whatever that saying is! </p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve found is that yes, annoyance factor is there when your calendar and time is spent with an IC you can not help. And then to pay out a bonus on it and have RDE time spent on it.</p>
<p>BUT&#8230;.</p>
<p>More money is lost when we have an RDE level employee (no personal hit on RDE I&#8217;m speaking of the position in general)  filtering in anyway.  Quickly they start filtering out what they should not for 2 reasons:</p>
<p>1 fear of back lash for setting something that was a &#8221; waste of your time&#8221;</p>
<p>2 it&#8217;s an easy excuse for poor lead conversion. &#8220;Why aren&#8217;t we converting leads to people waking through the door ( today, this week, etc)?&#8221; RDE. : &#8220;They are all DNQs, not enough debt, not the right debt, etc&#8221;</p>
<p>It IS important that when these ICs do come in we give them some (free) help or direction to better their situation so they feel like they got something and so they refer people we can help and so that when their low or wrong type of debt increases to something we can help they remember us.  This will help reduce their annoyance and help us make money down the road. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://attorneymarketpower.com/why-not-filter-leads-at-the-appointment-setting-stage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Not Filter Leads At the Appointment Setting Stage</title>
		<link>https://attorneymarketpower.com/why-not-filter-feads-at-the-appointment-setting-stage/</link>
		<comments>https://attorneymarketpower.com/why-not-filter-feads-at-the-appointment-setting-stage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtechdesigns.net/amp/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the exact email I received from a private client inquiring about why his team shouldn&#8217;t filter leads &#8230; <a href="https://attorneymarketpower.com/why-not-filter-feads-at-the-appointment-setting-stage/"></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the exact email I received from a private client inquiring about why his team shouldn&#8217;t filter leads before the lead came in for an appointment &#8212; and my exact, unedited response &#8212; originally sent from my iPhone.</p>
<p><strong>From Client:</strong><br />
Not complaining just asking.</p>
<p><em>Just saw person where the only debt is 230,000 in back child support.  He is 61 and living on SS Disability.  Nothing I can do.  He says he told Robert what the issue was and was told to come in anyway.</p>
<p>I have seen some notes where my assistant will indicate he took 15 minutes to talk IC in the door but they have 1,500 in total debt.  I have seen people who flat out tell me they told him their issue and it was not anything we could deal with and he got them to come in anyway.</p>
<p>So I am paying for him to waste his time and paying him bonus on the appt that shows that I cannot help and filling the attorney calendars with useless IC appointments.</p>
<p>Is there no way for him to just ask about if they have any debt or what kind of debt and say weed out the really easy ones.</p>
<p>With that said I have complete faith in you and if you tell me this is the way to do it and just deal with then I will.</em></p>
<p><strong>My candid response: </strong><br />
<em>Let me say this is a day ole dilemma or whatever that saying is! </p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve found is that yes, annoyance factor is there when your calendar and time is spent with an IC you can not help. And then to pay out a bonus on it and have RDE time spent on it.</p>
<p>BUT&#8230;.</p>
<p>More money is lost when we have an RDE level employee (no personal hit on RDE I&#8217;m speaking of the position in general)  filtering in anyway.  Quickly they start filtering out what they should not for 2 reasons:</p>
<p>1 fear of back lash for setting something that was a &#8221; waste of your time&#8221;</p>
<p>2 it&#8217;s an easy excuse for poor lead conversion. &#8220;Why aren&#8217;t we converting leads to people waking through the door ( today, this week, etc)?&#8221; RDE. : &#8220;They are all DNQs, not enough debt, not the right debt, etc&#8221;</p>
<p>It IS important that when these ICs do come in we give them some (free) help or direction to better their situation so they feel like they got something and so they refer people we can help and so that when their low or wrong type of debt increases to something we can help they remember us.  This will help reduce their annoyance and help us make money down the road. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://attorneymarketpower.com/why-not-filter-feads-at-the-appointment-setting-stage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
